search

epylar / s3fs

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/s3fs
GNU General Public License v2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

RPM Spec #211

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This is not actually a support request, but in fact I am giving you guys a 
heads up about the request for inclusion in fedora:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292

There are links in the ticket to the spec file in case you want to include it 
as it is right now, but in any case I will keep you posted as this develops.

Cheers

Original issue reported on code.google.com by gallego...@gmail.com on 25 Jul 2011 at 1:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This is awesome :)

Original comment by ben.lema...@gmail.com on 28 Jul 2011 at 4:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
So, turns out that there's a package already named `s3fs` in fedora. The 
easiest workaround would be to just package this one under a different 
package/binary name. Is there an easy way to do so? also, not sure what the 
consequences would be when having both installed and trying to use the 
/etc/fstab format. Thoughts? More info in the ticket 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292

Original comment by gallego...@gmail.com on 13 Jul 2012 at 4:56