In FlowNet the only available data types or distributions as of now are uniform and loguniform. ERT offers a few more. We should maybe aim at making it possible to define the same distributions in FlowNet. This means adding (at least) normal, lognormal, triangular, const, and maybe truncated_normal. The remaining ones (errf, derrf and dunif) are maybe a bit more obscure.
Adding more distributions will make some complications for the kriging/constraining to logs - other than that it should not be a problem.
In FlowNet the only available data types or distributions as of now are uniform and loguniform. ERT offers a few more. We should maybe aim at making it possible to define the same distributions in FlowNet. This means adding (at least) normal, lognormal, triangular, const, and maybe truncated_normal. The remaining ones (errf, derrf and dunif) are maybe a bit more obscure.
Adding more distributions will make some complications for the kriging/constraining to logs - other than that it should not be a problem.