Closed VitaminORA closed 1 year ago
Because ZFP is lossy compression.
Lossless compression is not supported by seismic-zfp, but it's likely your workflow will work absolutely fine with lossy compression. Do a numerical comparison of rr12.sgy
and rr12_sgz.sgy
, and you should find the differences are very small in comparison to the absolute values. If you find there are many large differences please open a new issue.
Thank you so much for answer
Dear all, I've tryed to use seismic-zfp, version 0.3.1. Firstly I've counted hash SGY file (metod SHA-1). 928D578CE3E0EC6BDE8896872EB7431584F5877D I've made compress SGY file and uncompress. In the end I've counted hash SGY file after uncompress (metod SHA-1)) E64792B077C6CFC9CB5392C805C95E98803085FB Files are different ???? Why ???? I used commands seismic-zfp sgy2sgz c:\Python\00\rr12.sgy c:\Python\00\rr12.sgz --bits-per-voxel 4 seismic-zfp sgz2sgy c:\Python\00\rr12.sgz c:\Python\00\rr12_sgz.sgy