Closed robincgit closed 12 months ago
It's not wrong per se. You might have seen that we too used cset
in https://github.com/maxpohlmann/Reducing-Reactive-to-Strong-Bisimilarity/blob/master/isabelle/HM_Logic.thy . The downside is that the Hennessy–Milner theorem then only works on transition systems with countable branching degree.
No, I haven't seen that repo yet. Thanks for the link, I'll take a look.
Regarding the downside: isn't that also the case if we take our index set to be the state set. Or are we aiming for a theory admitting uncountably infinite states?
If the state type (not set!) is the same as the index type, then you automatically get matching cardinality. Then, the theory also works if the state type is real
, for instance.
@robincgit Would you be okay with us closing this PR to increase overview?
I think we may close this PR. We decided for taking another approach.
Is there anything obviously wrong with this? See this discussion for my choice of countable sets.
Btw, does anyone here know Manuel Eberl personally? I would really like to meet him :)