search

erasmus-without-paper / ewp-specs-api-omobilities

Specifications of EWP's Outgoing Mobilities API.
MIT License
1 stars 4 forks source link

Tables B and D should be documented as optional #11

Closed wrygiel closed 7 years ago

wrygiel commented 7 years ago

As far as I know, most partners don't implement the "recognition part" of the new EUC LA template. There is a place for this data in the XSD, but many partners won't be able to provide it. We should warn the client implementers about this, and make sure that server implementers know that this part is not required (but still recommended).

wrygiel commented 7 years ago

We could even think of taking it one step further and removing the "recognition part" from EWP.

As far as I know, the receiving HEI doesn't care about the exact contents of tables B and D. It does sign the LA, but it verifies only tables A and C. So, perhaps, we don't need to actually even suggest the exchange of this data? @erasmus-without-paper/all-members

georgschermann commented 7 years ago

We would be among those not using it in the near future, but we are good with both ways.

kaiqu commented 7 years ago

Where are these tables defined? Can you provide a link, @wrygiel ?

wrygiel commented 7 years ago

Where are these tables defined?

In the EUC LA template (attached in the repo).