Polish developers reported a problem with Mobility's nominee-eqf-level field. Currently the field documentation states that:
This field contains the student's EQF level on this programme at the time of the nomination
However, Polish IRO says that it's more important to know the EQF level the student will have when the mobility acually begins. These two can be two different EQF levels. Should we introduce another field for expressing this distinction?
Polish developers reported a problem with Mobility's
nominee-eqf-level
field. Currently the field documentation states that:However, Polish IRO says that it's more important to know the EQF level the student will have when the mobility acually begins. These two can be two different EQF levels. Should we introduce another field for expressing this distinction?
E.g.
Both would be optional, server implementers would be able to supply both, or only one of them.