Open jiripetrzelka opened 4 months ago
Thank you Jiri. Let's wait for the opinion of the other providers.
Dear Janina, from the admin POV. We do not want any documents at this stage and would be happy if we are not overburdent by them. I agree totally with Jiri here.
Please review this change: https://github.com/mkurzydlowski/ewp-specs-api-omobilities/commit/29736b93ee5532bcff8430872d6183bf09a49144
I suggest that the pull request for version 3 of this API include the removal of the additional-requirement element because asking for additional documents at the nomination stage is:
My understanding is that these documents should be part of the application process and not part of the nomination process. The receiving institution can ask students to provide these documents in their application, i.e. outside EWP. IROs of the sending institution won't lose time gathering these documents from students on behalf of the receiving institution.
This approach will also solve the issue, which I described at https://github.com/erasmus-without-paper/ewp-specs-api-factsheet/issues/6 - We will not have to devise ways to define the set of relevant documents for each mobility type and acvitity type (and possibly for other parameters as well).