search

erc-dharma / tfc-khmer-epigraphy

This repository assembles data produced by the project Corpus des inscriptions khmères (before and during the DHARMA project).
https://dharma.hypotheses.org/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
2 stars 0 forks source link

revise K1298.xml #14

Closed arlogriffiths closed 4 months ago

arlogriffiths commented 4 years ago

I have just made a commit that involves a correction to the txt file for K. 499 and comments on the xml file for K. 1298. See https://github.com/erc-dharma/tfc-khmer-epigraphy/commit/49113ae3e36323f1357067a01a4b316a00aaf489 and https://github.com/erc-dharma/tfc-khmer-epigraphy/blob/master/texts/xml-provisional/Kunthea/K1298.xml.

@chhomkunthea : I have inserted a number of comments <!-- argr: ... --> into your recently committed version of K1298.xml. I have found no serious errors of encoding, but note that you take only the bare minimum from the source txt file. You need from now on to reproduce all philologically relevant observations from the txt files, and you need to encode variant readings systematically. That is a high priority. It will also be good to start making a habit of encode translations and bibliography

@dominiquesoutif : nous allons avoir besoin de renseignements plus systématiques sur le membre du CIK qui a fait le travail dans chaque fichier .txt dit "vérifié par CIK". La logique des éditions EpiDoc demande que soit rendu explicite la prise de responsabilité, et de fait @dg2018 et @arlogriffiths ont d'habitude signé les fichiers dont ils sont responsables. Je présume que c'était toi pour K. 1298. Serait-il possible que tu repasses le corpus txt et insères une indication du membre CIK responsable quand tu le sais et quand cela n'est pas encore indiqué dans le fichier? Cela alègera le travail pour Kunthea (et Chloé). Ne pas oublier de faire un git pull avant d'aborder ce travail, et un git add/commit/push après que tu l'auras bouclé!

@dg2018 et @dominiquesoutif : si vous aussi, vous pouviez aider à encadrer le travail de Kunthea en révisant de cette façon quelques fichiers xml, cela serait une contribution précieuse.

arlogriffiths commented 4 years ago

@chhomkunthea : your latest revision is now going in the right direction! I have just pushed my new round of comments. There are still quite a lot of them, but now they are more about how you encode than about how you/we read the inscription itself. And it is nice to see that you have conulsted the EG on several points, although there are also still several points where you need to absord more thoroughly what the EG prescribes. Please discuss separately (by email) with @dominiquesoutif about issues of interpretation. Once you have a next draft ready, inform us here, and we could ask Daniel to take a look.

arlogriffiths commented 1 year ago

@chhomkunthea : can this be closed now?

chhomkunthea commented 1 year ago

A reply from D. Soutif has been added to the file.

arlogriffiths commented 4 months ago

@chhomkunthea : can you close this issue now?