proper sign for virāma

[arlogriffiths]

I see that some (or all?) of Chloé's files use ∙ instead of · (keyboard ABC extended option+shift+9) for virāma.

Please correct all cases in your files. Best to do so one by one, because • may also occur as punctuation sign. At least it does in the files of some other team members.

Please respond to this issue with "done" when you're done.

[arlogriffiths]

Is still still an issue?

@michaelnmmeyer : can you help check if ∙ occurs in any places right after a consonant and without <g> tag?

[michaelnmmeyer]

We have about a hundred occurrences in these files:

DHARMA_INSCIK00044.xml

DHARMA_INSCIK00111.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00173.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00174.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00211.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00215.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00216-N1.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00216-N2.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00216-S.xml DHARMA_INSCIK00573.xml DHARMA_INSSiddham00192.xml

Le dim. 7 avr. 2024 à 05:33, arlogriffiths @.***> a écrit :

Is still still an issue?

@michaelnmmeyer https://github.com/michaelnmmeyer : can you help check if ∙ occurs in any places right after a consonant and without tag?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/erc-dharma/tfc-khmer-epigraphy/issues/36#issuecomment-2041295555, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACYU73HJBLTXKJDGLE4W3Z3Y4C463AVCNFSM6AAAAAAUWBZI32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBRGI4TKNJVGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[arlogriffiths]

Thanks @michaelnmmeyer.

• [ ] @chhomkunthea : could you check all K. files listed by Michaël and convert any cases of • that represent virāma to ·, while implementing a suitable encoding with <g> in all other cases? Let me know if there are any cases where you hesitate about what is meant.

• [x] @danbalogh : can you check the case in Siddham00192?

Please check the checkbox when you're done, after which I'll close this issue.

[danbalogh]

In Siddham00192, the instance is in an XML comment that may in the course of time be converted into an apparatus note: "L4. G prints "Bappakah∙", which may have been meant for jihvāmūlīya, which is clear in the rubbing." I think this should stay as is, and only instances of ∙ in the text of editions should be checked.

[chhomkunthea]

Dear Arlo,

I see that there are nine Cambodian inscriptions in the list. The two kinds of dot representing virāma look very similar on Oxygen Editor. I can manually replace the wrong dot with the right one. But I don’t understand about “implementing a suitable encoding with ”.

Best, Kunthea

On 8 Apr 2024, at 14:27, arlogriffiths @.***> wrote:

Thanks @michaelnmmeyer https://github.com/michaelnmmeyer.

@chhomkunthea https://github.com/chhomkunthea : could you check all K. files listed by Michaël and convert any cases of • that represent virāma to ·, while implementing a suitable encoding with in all other cases? Let me know if there are any cases where you hesitate about what is meant.

@danbalogh https://github.com/danbalogh : can you check the case in Siddham00192?

Please check the checkbox when you're done, after which I'll close this issue.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/erc-dharma/tfc-khmer-epigraphy/issues/36#issuecomment-2042044161, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM4GVNZVL52XKIB3SQOCYHDY4JBHJAVCNFSM6AAAAAAUWBZI32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBSGA2DIMJWGE. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

[arlogriffiths]

I mean that if and only if you find cases where ∙ is clearly not intended to represent virāma but rather represents a symbol, then you should replace it not by · but by <g> or <g>.</g> with appropriate @type inside <g> — in other words, you should then encode it following EGD 4.2.3 or 4.2.4 (gdoc version).

Is it clear now? Check the box above when you're done.

[danbalogh]

@chhomkunthea , if you have any difficulties with the encoding, you can also turn to me. I was planning to talk to you about some complex layouts sometime soon, after Michaël and I have discussed what would be the best strategy for going forward.

[chhomkunthea]

Yes, it is now clear. Thank you! I’ll start correcting the files soon.

Best, Kutnhea

On 9 Apr 2024, at 11:52, arlogriffiths @.***> wrote:

I mean that if and only if you find cases where ∙ is clearly not intended to represent virāma but rather represents a symbol, then you should replace it not by · but by or . with appropriate @type https://github.com/type inside — in other words, you should then encode it following EGD 4.2.3 or 4.2.4 (gdoc version).

Is it clear now? Check the box above when you're done.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/erc-dharma/tfc-khmer-epigraphy/issues/36#issuecomment-2044144284, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM4GVN6ZUDE5XEEQDR4Q63LY4NXXTAVCNFSM6AAAAAAUWBZI32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBUGE2DIMRYGQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

[chhomkunthea]

Thank you! Look forward to hearing from you about the complex layouts.

Best, Kunthea

On 9 Apr 2024, at 14:56, Dániel Balogh @.***> wrote:

@chhomkunthea https://github.com/chhomkunthea , if you have any difficulties with the encoding, you can also turn to me. I was planning to talk to you about some complex layouts sometime soon, after Michaël and I have discussed what would be the best strategy for going forward.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/erc-dharma/tfc-khmer-epigraphy/issues/36#issuecomment-2044375454, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM4GVNZVPZ5UQWGPZPE3NMDY4ONMPAVCNFSM6AAAAAAUWBZI32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBUGM3TKNBVGQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.