Closed ajaniak closed 3 years ago
Thanks a lot.
bib:Bosch1928_01 Sarkar1971-1972_01
, and have now corrected that mistake in the relevant file.@unit="appendix"
is fine: which files are concerned?<citedRange>
For @unit:
@aditiagunawan
@arlogriffiths
@ekobastiawan
@m-schoettel
@unit="appendix"
is only in Canggu
Sorry, Axelle, EG p. 116 says:
by default,
<citedRange>
will be understood to refer to page numbers, so references to pages can simply be added as the content of this element use a hyphen to record a range of pages, e.g.<citedRange>12-21</citedRange>
the number of the last page should always be recorded in full, e.g.<citedRange>123-124</citedRange>
(not 123-4 or 123-24) use a comma (followed by a space) to list non-adjacent pages, e.g.<citedRange>12, 24</citedRange>
to refer to an entity other than a page, add the attribute@unit
to<citedRange>
with one of the following values
So I don't think at least the cases in Wurare.xml are encoding errors.
Or do you think the EG shouild be changed on this point?
My mistake.
@ajaniak : can we close this issue now?
Dear @erc-dharma/nusantara-epigraphy,
It seems you haven't really started working on those, but for some of you more advanced in their work, please take the following remarks into account:
bib:
have been forgotten several times for both@source
and@target
, also it is necessary for the second reference, e.g notbib:Bosch1928_01 Sarkar1971-1972_01
butbib:Bosch1928_01 bib:Sarkar1971-1972_01
+
, missing ending number.... ). Be careful with this, any mistake will make impossible retrieving data from Zotero.@unit="annex
haven't been planed by the EG, could@unit="appendix"
be enough ?<citedRange>
always take the attribute@unit
.Best,