Closed arlogriffiths closed 4 years ago
I'm done
@aditiagunawan , @m-schoettel : this is a reminder for you two (although I don't know if Aditia has encoded any inscriptions where my instruction is relevant)
It's done too.
@aditiagunawan : we're waiting for you on this one (though maybe your files never need to cite Damais, Nakada, or any such inventory). Just let us know.
Until now I not found yet such cases, but I will keep in mind and save this notice. Probably one day I use it when dealing with the manuscript metadata.
OK, so I'm closing this issue now.
In the sec. bibl. sections of your bibliographies, please try always to capture all the bibliographically relevant details, not only the pages. Thus, for publications of the nature of an inventory, or relying on inventiry numbers, such as Damais 1952 and 1955, I recommend the following format (from my work in progress on encoding Wurare)
`72-73 A.174
`
please revise your
<bib>
s on this point, and respond to this issue with "I'm done" when you're done.