Closed matthew-schultz closed 5 years ago
I'm confused on commit e25ca9d, was that portion of the code never used? I'm just wondering if we revert the code to e25ca9d if it would work or crash for not identifying locked user.
e25ca9d was a vestige from when we were not sure if the script should have as responsibility for creating a database user. We decided against it, and that the user management should be done manually to avoid too many assumptions. It is only done once anyway for the entire set of databases as well.
97