Closed Rustixir closed 1 year ago
We are moving the same way https://twitter.com/halturin/status/1634165290564034562
how is ergo with overhead of framework can beats erlang ??!!!
in terms of network messaging Erlang has poor performance due to the ETF encoder/decoder (lists/maps especially). Beside that, Ergo ETF has stack-less implementation
your framework heavily using mutex for synchronization
it depends on where it's used. In Ergo we use most of the time RWMutex which is not the same as regular Mutex in terms of performance.
I move it to the Discussion. Hope you don't mind.
https://erlangforums.com/t/ring-benchmark-erlang-vs-go/684/12
in erlang community we did some benchkmarks around (raw golang) and ( erlang ) erlang was winner in message passing. erlang internally used lock-free algorithm for registry and communication between mailbox. but golang used mutex for channels !!! and in your framework heavily using mutex for synchronization !!!
how is ergo with overhead of framework can beats erlang ??!!!