Open prdes opened 2 years ago
It's an interesting suggestion but I don't anticipate doing this anytime soon. SANICK is useful in part because nicknames are a shared namespace, whereas realnames are not.
I don't see a clear use case for this in between "just ignore it" and "KILL/UBAN the user"?
I think KILL/UBAN can be a bit extreme especially if the user happens to be AFK and a potential scenario is clients like IRCCloud showing the real name next to every message or clients that support extended-join
It's an interesting suggestion but I don't anticipate doing this anytime soon. SANICK is useful in part because nicknames are a shared namespace, whereas realnames are not.
I don't see a clear use case for this in between "just ignore it" and "KILL/UBAN the user"?
There is a clearish soln to change realname it can even match if nick == realname use sanick for both but if you don't want it ill close this. I was planning to work on it
The ability to change an undesirable nick exists, this would essentially expand that to also allow
OPER
s to changerealname
i.e.setname
but for OPERs suggested by @pilzgift ..