Closed eric-pedersen closed 6 years ago
This looks good for now Eric. I might be tempted to go into a bit more detail but I'll put off adding more words until I look through the whole manuscript at once. I don't think we need to go into great detail about this stuff, just point out the Bayesian interpretation exists (and is unavoidable if you think that there is "a smooth" that you're estimating).
Sounds good! Okay, I think we basically have a finished draft then. I'm going to go through and fix a couple typos, and add a couple comments seeing if we should add/remove certain things, but I think we're basically there!
Ace! I’ll take a look ASAP!
On 7 Aug 2018, at 13:10, Eric Pedersen notifications@github.com wrote:
Sounds good! Okay, I think we basically have a finished draft then. I'm going to go through and fix a couple typos, and add a couple comments seeing if we should add/remove certain things, but I think we're basically there!
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
I just added a section of text about Bayesian approaches including HGAMs. It could use a quick read over to make sure I didn't make any drastic mistakes (I'm not really a Bayesian at heart, and I don't want to misrepresent anything).