Produce a report on the pages on plone.org that are outdated or misleading in light of the recent Plone 3 release.

[GoogleCodeExporter]

plone.org, like an complex website, has its share of outdated or plain wrong 
content. Given that 
Plone 3 has recently been released, now is a good time to clean some of that up.

The task: Produce a detailed report showing which parts of Plone.org are 
outdated and suggest what 
needs to be removed and what may be updated.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by optil...@gmail.com on 19 Nov 2007 at 10:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by l...@gmail.com on 27 Nov 2007 at 7:02

• Changed state: Open
• Added labels: 2-day

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by l...@gmail.com on 28 Nov 2007 at 11:22

• Added labels: Documentation
• Removed labels: Documenation

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I claim this Task.

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 6 Dec 2007 at 12:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This task goes to evan.carmi, we look forward to hearing from you in 2 days.

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 6 Dec 2007 at 1:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 6 Dec 2007 at 1:08

• Changed state: Claimed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 6 Dec 2007 at 5:55

• Added labels: claimed-evan.carmi

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Should the final report be in a PDF or ODF file or formatted as a plone page?

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 8 Dec 2007 at 6:54

[GoogleCodeExporter]

That's completely up to you, as long as it's not a word document we're happy :)

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 8 Dec 2007 at 8:16

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by ospoad...@gmail.com on 8 Dec 2007 at 6:02

• Added labels: claimedby-evan.carmi
• Removed labels: claimed-evan.carmi

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Please see attached.

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 9 Dec 2007 at 7:59

Attachments:

• website_outdations.odt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 9 Dec 2007 at 11:32

Attachments:

• website_outdations.odt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I would appreciate if someone gave me some feedback on what I have done or 
closed
this task. I would like to continue on another task.

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 12:22

Attachments:

• website_outdations.odt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Ok, I've just had a look.  You can leave out 404 pages, another task produced a
comprehensive list of those.  If you could concentrate more on things like
documentation that looks like it's current but applies to older versions that'd 
be great.

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 12:29

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 4:35

Attachments:

• website_outdations.odt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 4:42

Attachments:

• website_outdations.odt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi Evan,

I've had a read over that, and you still seem to be taking the wrong approach.  
I've
cut out the bits that are relevant to this ask, they're:

Outdated Plone Website Pages

    • http://plone.org/development/teams/website-team/
       ◦The read more link contains no additional information.
    • http://plone.org/events/conferences/vienna-2005
       ◦It might be beneficial to remove old conference information because of the
amount of links that are not valid anymore.
    • The FAQ section is not separated by version. Inside “the FAQs” is information
about all of the different versions of plone. I think it would be more 
understandable
if these were separated into sections based on plone version.
    • http://plone.org/documentation/faq/webstats-javascript-plone3
       ◦This FAQ needs to be updated to reflect that 3.0.1 has been released. This might
be confusing for users who are having a problem with javascript web stats but 
the
problem is not related to this bug.

We're really pushing for things that look like they're useful, up-to-date
documentation and tips but are for old versions so would confuse people.

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 4:46

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I am a little confused by your post. The things that you pasted ARE relevant 
and good
examples of what you want? Or they are not? You said "If you could concentrate 
more
on things like documentation that looks like it's current but applies to older
versions that'd be great." I tried to accomplish this going through the FAQ page
looking for things that "applies to older versions" and then I wrote about 
whether I
thought it should be removed or updated. I am just trying to understand exactly 
what
you want.

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 5:23

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Sorry, you're right, that wasn't overly clear.  The things I pasted are what I 
see as
being relevant.  The other things were on the more technical side.  While they 
were
all still valid points, they're not what we're looking for in this instance.

I can see you went through the documentation section, but you picked up 
specificd
problems with the documents such as capitalisation or where they're linked, not 
the
content of the document and its relevance now that plone 3 is out.

I hope that's a bit more clear?

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 5:32

[GoogleCodeExporter]

That was much more clear. Thanks!

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 6:38

Attachments:

• website_outdations.odt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Okay, attached is my report. I hope that it is beneficial.

-Evan

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2007 at 1:19

Attachments:

• website_outdations.odt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Could I get confirmation that I have completed this task so I can continue
contributing to Plone with another task?

Thanks,
Evan

Original comment by evan.ca...@gmail.com on 16 Dec 2007 at 2:38

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes - thank you!

Original comment by optil...@gmail.com on 16 Dec 2007 at 2:47

• Changed state: Closed