Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
clang complains "error: expression result unused [-Wunused-value]" in a couple places while building the seccomp sandbox. I've listed the places below. Instead of silencing the compiler, you probably want to log an error. I don't know how logging works in the seccomp sandbox. Index: mutex.h =================================================================== --- mutex.h (revision 153) +++ mutex.h (working copy) @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ #else #error Unsupported target platform #endif - NOINTR_SYS(sys.futex(mutex, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, 0)); + (void)NOINTR_SYS(sys.futex(mutex, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, 0)); return rc; } Index: sandbox.cc =================================================================== --- sandbox.cc (revision 153) +++ sandbox.cc (working copy) @@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ status_ = STATUS_AVAILABLE; } int rc; - NOINTR_SYS(sys.waitpid(pid, &rc, 0)); - NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(fds[0])); + (void)NOINTR_SYS(sys.waitpid(pid, &rc, 0)); + (void)NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(fds[0])); return status_ != STATUS_UNSUPPORTED; } } @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ // Take a snapshot of the current memory mappings. These mappings will be // off-limits to all future mmap(), munmap(), mremap(), and mprotect() calls. snapshotMemoryMappings(processFdPub_, proc_self_maps_); - NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(proc_self_maps_)); + (void)NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(proc_self_maps_)); proc_self_maps_ = -1; // Creating the trusted thread enables sandboxing Index: trusted_process.cc =================================================================== --- trusted_process.cc (revision 153) +++ trusted_process.cc (working copy) @@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ nextThread = currentThread->mem->newSecureMem; goto newThreadCreated; } else if (header.sysnum == __NR_exit) { - NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(iter->second.fdPub)); - NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(iter->second.fd)); + (void)NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(iter->second.fdPub)); + (void)NOINTR_SYS(sys.close(iter->second.fd)); SecureMem::Args* secureMem = currentThread->mem; threads.erase(iter); secureMemPool_.push_back(secureMem);
Original issue reported on code.google.com by thakis@google.com on 26 Jan 2011 at 4:05
thakis@google.com
Fixed in http://codereview.chromium.org/7134059/
Original comment by markus@chromium.org on 9 Jun 2011 at 10:35
markus@chromium.org
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
thakis@google.com
on 26 Jan 2011 at 4:05