ericmckean / webm

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/webm
0 stars 0 forks source link

vp9 Assertion `frames_to_arf < cpi->rc.frames_to_key' failed. #695

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What is the expected behavior? What do you see instead?
I expected encoding to be finished.

I got this error
vpxenc: ../libvpx/vp9/encoder/vp9_onyx_if.c:3416: vp9_get_compressed_data: 
Assertion `frames_to_arf < cpi->rc.frames_to_key' failed.

What version are you using? On what operating system?
Version obtained from git on January 12, 2014. Only the vp9 encoder was 
enabled. This is on linux.

Can you reproduce using the vpxdec or vpxenc tools? What command line are
you using?
I assume you can. This was done by converting a y4m file into a a webm file.

Please provide any additional information below.
I would love to provide the attachment but I'm not sure it will let me since I 
can only get the file size down to 10.9 MB. I'm not sure if I should even try 
uploading that given how slow my upload is.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by kylesief...@gmail.com on 17 Jan 2014 at 6:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I managed to cut the compressed size of the file. Using a hex editor, I set the 
data in a number of frames to zero. Only the last frame and frames that are 
essential for producing error are left.

Hopefully this process also makes finding the problem easier.

Original comment by kylesief...@gmail.com on 17 Jan 2014 at 9:22

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I used a more recent version of the repo and it seems to encode all the way 
now. Obviously, that doesn't mean the problem is gone. After a quick search, I 
found what I needed to give the unique descriptor for the repo version.

git describe outputs "v1.3.0-617-gf83c12b" for the version that fails.

Original comment by kylesief...@gmail.com on 22 Jan 2014 at 7:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
please reopen if the problem appears again.

Original comment by ya...@google.com on 23 Jan 2014 at 11:01