ericmelz / NeatQuick

Transfers Neatworks Receipts to Quicken Essentials for Mac
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKKC01CQehk
Apache License 2.0
2 stars 1 forks source link

Feature: Allow splits #2

Open ericmelz opened 12 years ago

ericmelz commented 12 years ago

Receipts with sales tax should (optionally) be saved as a split transaction in Quicken. Ex: Grocery store receipt has $5.50 total, $.50 tax. Resulting transaction will have a split containing $5.00 for groceries and $.50 for sales tax.

PlassFam commented 11 years ago

Eric,

I hate to dig this thing back up, but I just got your code working for transfers (much user error) after a year of it sitting on the shelf.

I've got a boat-load of receipts in Neat that has the tax divided out. For tax reasons, I'd like to preserve this when it gets transferred - without having to do it by hand. I see in TransferUtil.groovy you define 'Sales Tax' as "importantLabels" and "labelToFieldId." Easy fix???

Thanks, Bryan

ericmelz commented 11 years ago

Hey Bryan,

I'm very happy to hear that you got the software working, that's great!

I'm fairly busy these days, so if you could attempt to make the fix yourself, you will likely get your results much quicker than if you wait for me to get to it. I'd recommend putting in loads of print statements in the code so you can determine what's going on. Sorry I can't be more helpful, if things loosen up I'll let you know.

Best,

eric

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:55 PM, PlassFam notifications@github.com wrote:

Eric,

I hate to dig this thing back up, but I just got your code working for transfers (much user error) after a year of it sitting on the shelf.

I've got a boat-load of receipts in Neat that has the tax divided out. For tax reasons, I'd like to preserve this when it gets transferred - without having to do it by hand. I see in TransferUtil.groovy you define 'Sales Tax' as "importantLabels" and "labelToFieldId." Easy fix???

Thanks, Bryan

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ericmelz/NeatQuick/issues/2#issuecomment-12353452.