search

ericnondahl / robovm-tapjoy11

Partial Tapjoy v11 bindings for use with RoboVM
0 stars 0 forks source link

TJPlacement question #1

Open kizinfo opened 8 years ago

kizinfo commented 8 years ago

building out these bindings for TJ 11.5. Does the constructor change not need to release the retained handle on dispose to permit GC? And was the original constructor not designed to prevent more than 1 instance being created somehow?

Currently have issue with placement callbacks that try to re-request content inside the on dismiss callback not resulting in another content ready callback.

ericnondahl commented 8 years ago

Hey, here is the related issue in the robovm github: https://github.com/robovm/robovm/issues/1163

The old TJPLacement constructor leaked memory and eventually crashed, see the explanation from Niklas for detailed info.