Open JotaRandom opened 11 years ago
I tought to name her twilight4 (twilight [in series] 4), but I like twilacorn better. twlightprincess is prone to long file names.
I think the current metainfo should be kept as is, but in all images where Twilight is alicorn she should be royal rather than semiroyal. I do not agree that Shining Armour and the rest of the Sparkle family are royal just because Twilight is now; this somewhat of a why to become royal so it deserves some discussion. The exact details why she is royal is not shared in the episode;
P.S. Do we have a flutterknight or knightfluttershy?
So if Starswirl would manage to finish the magic, would he become the first alicorn?
About the royal, in this case I agree with no royal for parents neither Shining Armor (or Armour) now. but me, what is semiroyal now, You can transform into an Alicorn (finally now is official) and receive the thitle of Prince/Princess automagicaly or married againt one of them and became Prince/Princess too ....
I give my +1 to royal only to Actual titled ponies (Prince and Princess) but no to they parents
and about shy... we can have 3 knigh-like fluttershy in the history (Private Pancy, Lancer fom Crystal Empire, Knightshy(?))
So for Starwirl... I remmember that Celestia is more old than Starswirl...maybe Prince StarSwirl The Bearded The Three Alicorn maybe.... but what is the Spell supposed to do??
PS: Twilightprincess is a joke the name not the pony PS2: and for Twilight season4 maybe: twilight-4 (whit ' - ' ) PS#: Zodiac ponies on Extra or on ponies, Are aprobed by Hbr for they hub-web-site
EDIT: Funy Typo, Tree -> Three
This is getting too confusing, +1 for abondoning semiroyal and just use royal on the alicorns, princes and king Sombra.
I think the spell is suppost the burn your cutie mark into your floor…
And Queen Chrysalis too, right??
Yes! I tought of her as am alicorn, but that could be questioned, certianly her minons cannot be alicorns sense they are (probably) not royal.
If any other disagree with the last commit mentioned here please say: 'ME' else close as fix'd
So is the new Twilight introduced in S01E01 or S03E13?
Twilight Sparkle: S01E01 Princess Twilight 'Alicorn' Sparkle: S03E13 ... ok Technicaly on Fanart and late on Hsbr stand on europe and late on the show and the S03E13 was created in late 2012
ok I proced to close this issue, If any have any Rejection about the changes or another view point, reopen the bug and say yours words to Princess Celestia
Nightmare moon is royal because is Luna corrupted, right?
I thing is confussing now... Issue 8 and Issue 9 show [Spoiler] Nightmare Rarity; who talk if was a diferent entity from Rarity and if was the same as Nightmare Moon in S01E01 and S01E02[/Spoiler] Split Nighmaremoon from they Luna References and treat as a different character (and add [Spiler] Nighmare Rarity [/spoiler] in te process) or left as is now
I going to revisit this issue when S04E01-02 has been aired, so we maybe (or not) have a little more clear idea about 'The nightmare'. But for now I thing that nightmare moon isn't royal and Naighmare Rarity not too, but 'the nightmare' is in a weird way.
PD: I want do a 3.0.2 during S04 This is why I want this proper deffined for ponysay
Ok look like Princess is more like a tittle in the same fashion is Cid or Round Knight. So whit exception of our 4 royal leader Celestia, Luna, Sombra and Chrysalis all the others are simply a Knight-a-like tittle even Nightmare Moon concidering the Comic as canon. So is safe not add Twilight to royal nor NMM or both plus NMR to a Cid-a-like-or-Round-Knight-a-like tittle for search and let royal only for those 4.
Opinions??
From Season 7: Agh "King" Thorax was a mix of Conquest against Chrysalis and Democraticaly elected leader...
Watch S03E13 first
Actually Twilight is a Princess, but she receive the tittle by a 'Transformation' add royal to all twilight ponyfiles or use it only for twilightprincess and twilacorn (in work process now)
this at same thime affect the status for shining armor now having royals from both sides, this is affected by deprecation of semiroyal or extension to this (by transformation) mentioned on #133
Yours opinions are valuable
I in pro for all are royal and no semiroyal