Closed krcenov closed 3 years ago
Why don't you use Card - 1 type? NRA don't distinguish credit or debit card nor sales person distinguish them when accept card payment.
Why don't you use Card - 1 type? NRA don't distinguish credit or debit card nor sales person distinguish them when accept card payment.
Beacause it does not trigger POS terminal payment.
POS terminal integration is not implemented in ErpNet.FP. So, even if this type of payment (debit card - 2) is appended to the list of supported payment types, the instruction for initialization of the communication with the POS terminal will not be sent. The problem with the POS terminals must be solved by implementing that support in all FP devices, by their custom protocol requirements. Feel free to implement this functionality, it would be useful to many POS/ErpNet.FP users.
I have implemented it half way for the X devices in the Datecs protocol, since i need this for customers. I am a DATECS employee from the Software department.
POS terminal integration is not implemented in ErpNet.FP. So, even if this type of payment (debit card - 2) is appended to the list of supported payment types, the instruction for initialization of the communication with the POS terminal will not be sent. The problem with the POS terminals must be solved by implementing that support in all FP devices, by their custom protocol requirements. Feel free to implement this functionality, it would be useful to many POS/ErpNet.FP users.
Your statement is partialy correct. Using payment type 2 does initialise communication with the POS terminal. And the terminal displays the sum needed to pay. When you pay the sum, the WP-50X then prints the reciept. The problem is that the ERP does not send command 55,15\t in order to print the card transaction details.
Yes this is what I meant: "The problem is that the ERP (ErpNet.FP) does not send command 55,15\t in order to print the card transaction details." I do not have POS terminal device with me to test that functionality, so feel free to implement and test it. Then do a pull request with your implementation, and we will be happy to merge it with the master branch. Of course the presence or absence of the POS terminal must be gracefully handled by your implementation, otherwise we will break the compatibility with the current version protocol and usage patterns.
Btw, for X models sending 55 (37h) Pinpad commands
w parameter 15\t
after each and every 56 (38h) Close fiscal receipt
just returns a harmless ERR_PINPAD_NOT_CONF
w/ no side-effects as far as I can see.
Anyway, I'll wait for proper Datecs PR to be sure this extra command would be enough to handle pinpads receipts and for the fix to get tested w/ real pinpads (by Datecs).
Yes this is what I meant: "The problem is that the ERP (ErpNet.FP) does not send command 55,15\t in order to print the card transaction details." I do not have POS terminal device with me to test that functionality, so feel free to implement and test it. Then do a pull request with your implementation, and we will be happy to merge it with the master branch. Of course the presence or absence of the POS terminal must be gracefully handled by your implementation, otherwise we will break the compatibility with the current version protocol and usage patterns.
A colleage of mine representative of DatecsPay should get in touch with you soon.
We are studying possible solutions to the request. One possible solution is to implement payment terminal activation TRANSPARENTLY to the user application.
With this solution, the end-users will be able to activate the usage of the payment terminal, without changes to the user application.
If we want to provide explicit control to the user app, this will require changes in the protocol which will make the protocol more command-oriented (containing commands what to do) and not so declarative (containing just a description of the fiscal operation). This will minimize the usefulness of the protocol for generic information transfer and will focus it too much on just the task of printing to fiscal printers. We would like to avoid this, if possible. In the future, if there is some form of electronic fiscal data transfer to the government and the protocol should be up to the task (if possible). For that, we shall keep it declarative and simple as much as possible.
Please comment on the proposal.
We implemented terminal activation, which is transparent to the client apps. See here:
Hello, we have little problem with devices with DATECS PAY & WP-150 MX fiscal device, when user push end of the working day "Z-report" we don't have POS report for the day and we must to disconnect the fiscal device from PC and then to hit manually POS report for the day, because if we don't do that, user can't work again with POS on the next working day.
This is the last version: https://github.com/erpnet/ErpNet.FP/releases/tag/v1.1.0.721
The only condition to make report from the payment terminal together with the main report of the device is that there is a connection (active and connected bluetooth) between them at the time of launching the report. Both types of reports (Z and X) are supported. Support is from this version: https://github.com/erpnet/ErpNet.FP/releases/tag/v1.1.0.318
Hello, again, can you please tell me which model of the Datecs fiscal devices and datecs pay devices we to use, to have optimal work with Erp.NET.FP, please make me a recommendation.
I'm sorry, but we cannot provide a recommendation as we lack experience in practical work with cash registers. Our business is not related to this. Please contact DATECS support for assistance.
I have a Datecs WP-50X and i want it to make a sale with payment type 2 these are the payments in the device i can use all other payment types, but debit card is missing. cash-0 check-3 coupons-5 ext-coupons-4 card-1 PAYMENT 2 IS MISSING