search

errandwolfe / growl

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/growl
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Feature request Implement a wireshark protocol dissector for new growl protocol #25

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
After talking to Rudy, he suggested lodging a bug so that this can be kept 
track of.

Benefits:
A wireshark protocol dissector would allow developers who are implementing 
the new protocol to find errors and ensure that their new library adheres tot 
he spec.

Wireshark runs on Linux, Windows and Mac, enabling people who create 
network clients to debug their library locally.

Once implemented it is a very light burden on growl, upstream will carry and 
distribute the dissector.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by wmeal...@gmail.com on 27 Sep 2009 at 5:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
We won't be doing this ourselves, but it's not a bad idea.

Original comment by chrisf.g...@gmail.com on 29 Sep 2009 at 11:01

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by chrisf.g...@gmail.com on 29 Sep 2009 at 11:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
We're changing to a new protocol, tcp based. How hard is it to make a 
dissector?

Original comment by chrisf.g...@gmail.com on 6 Dec 2009 at 5:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by chrisf.g...@gmail.com on 6 Dec 2009 at 5:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by chrisf.g...@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2010 at 4:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I'm not blocking 2.0 on this one. If someone wants to implement it, that'd be 
great. I don't know when we'd get to it though.

Original comment by chrisf.g...@gmail.com on 30 Jul 2010 at 2:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
We're not likely to do this, but if someone did we'd include it in our sdk or 
as a download. If you want to make a wireshark dissector, please contact me 
once you have it made at chris@growl.info

Original comment by ch...@growl.info on 28 Sep 2011 at 6:47