Closed SMoraisAnsys closed 3 days ago
Yes, I'll update when I get a chance (PRs are also welcome).
You can also currently change the version of reviewdog by providing a value for reviewdog_url
, although this won't help in cases where new features aren't yet supported in this action.
Cool, I'll give it a try then ! Thanks for confirming that you are not against this changes :)
I'm having a go at this request, and would appreciate feedback on the PR when possible.
Does it make sense to re-add the level
input at the same time, or do it later? I'm leaving the PR as draft until I'm sure.
@SMoraisAnsys Go ahead and test the new version. I saw one of the workflows was failing, though (https://github.com/errata-ai/vale-action/actions/runs/11849732087/job/33023465079)
Hi, I was wondering if this action could use a more recent version of
reviewdog
.Currently, the version used is
0.17
https://github.com/errata-ai/vale-action/blob/91ac403e8d26f5aa1b3feaa86ca63065936a85b6/src/input.ts#L61 while the most recent version is currently0.20.1
One of the gain from changing the version would be to leverage
-fail-level
instead of-fail-on-error
. I don't know if you are open to the idea of adding back thelevel
input which was removed previously (https://github.com/errata-ai/vale-action/commit/c4213d4de3d5f718b8497bd86161531c78992084). Since I couldn't find information on why it got removed, maybe that one of the reason for such limitation was the lack of feature inreviewdog
and using the new version might help on this.More information: