search

escamoteur / inKinoRx

Apache License 2.0
52 stars 10 forks source link

Way more readable #1

Open ghost opened 6 years ago

ghost commented 6 years ago

Gotta admit it's easier to follow than redux.

Did you do any benchmarking ? Would be very interesting to see the comparison with the redux version don't you think ?

escamoteur commented 6 years ago

You mean performance wise benchmark? No haven't done but was told that redux would be a bit as slower

ghost commented 6 years ago

Ok. Well I am definitely keen on rx approach and will play around with this repo.

One thing I am planning to test is how well grpc works with the Rx approach. The types are codegenerator on the server and client side. I know that this demo currently just uses json over http and the types for holding the data are hand written.

The reason for grpc is the runtime speed on heavy connections and the developer productivity. But the dart types generated can be difficult to use with the reflux approach. I am particularly interested in serialising the client side store in a protobuf so it can be distributed easily also.

Anyway just letting you know as this is something I will be prototyping with Rx approach.

On Wed, May 2, 2018, 7:55 AM escamoteur notifications@github.com wrote:

You mean performance wise benchmark? No haven't done but was told that redux would be a bit as slower

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/escamoteur/inKinoRx/issues/1#issuecomment-385872128, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATuCwi-OXBsJigu7EdbLgKEANPe2pBNIks5tuUo2gaJpZM4Tub7Y .

escamoteur commented 6 years ago

Let me know what you find out