codecov[bot]
commented
11 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
af28a03) 48.66% compared to head (8be8879) 54.65%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #345 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 48.66% 54.65% +5.98% ========================================== Files 75 68 -7 Lines 10374 5800 -4574 ========================================== - Hits 5049 3170 -1879 + Misses 4757 2333 -2424 + Partials 568 297 -271 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Had a bit of an epiphany, most things you see allow applications, be they images, containers etc. to have a set of tags attached to them. At the most basic level this allows grouping of applications to make finding what you desire easier e.g. monitoring, logging, ad inifitum. But you could also look at it another way, rather than filtering out the cruft, you could use/abuse it to prevent cruft from being shown in the first place...