Closed smathot closed 8 years ago
This is brilliant, thanks! Will have a better look next week, including SMI tests. Will try to hunt down a Tobii too. Let me know if you've managed to test on an EyeLink; if not, I'll use ours.
I have tested it quite a bit on the EyeLink and EyeTribe, from within OpenSesame. This seems to work pretty well, aside from the issues that were already open.
Do you think it is feasible to maintain decent SMI and Tobii support? If not, we could also decide to cut our losses and clearly mark support for these as 'experimental'.
This pull request contains a few big changes
Settings
First, as we discussed in #13, I implemented a
pygaze.settings
module. This takes the default settings frompygaze.defaults
and overwrites these with settings fromconstants.py
, if it exists.The main benefit of this module is that it avoids copying the settings as global variables across all the other modules, which made it very difficult to change the settings programmatically. It also looks cleaner, I think.
Behavior-wise it's similar to how it was.
OpenSesame 3.0
I updated the plug-ins for OpenSesame 3.0.
Various other things
I fixed some minor other things, and added a
py3compat
module to start working on Python 3 compatibility.Testing
Basic things appear to work fine. I have mostly tested the two dummy eye trackers and the eyetribe, and I plan to test the EyeLink soon. I do not have access to the other trackers; however, I have changed their respective modules to work with the new settings system, so they should be tested as well.
Let me know what you think!