search

esdscom / sdscom-xml

Schema definition and other documents of eSDScom (formerly SDScom and ESCom), the standard for electronic exchange of Safety Data Sheets in a structured, processible way across Europe and other regions. Please read the wiki for more info. All work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/legalcode)
https://www.esdscom.eu
27 stars 6 forks source link

Code representation for combined PrecautionaryStatement #175

Closed dirk-qualisys closed 6 years ago

dirk-qualisys commented 6 years ago

CLP labelling requires some P statements which are a combination of others, e.g. the classification as "Pyr. Solid 1" will cause these P statements: P210, P222, P231+P232, P233, P280, P302+P335+P334, P370+P378. While P210 will simply carry the phrase code "210", which is consistent with the general SDScom phrase type having zero or one PhraseCode. But the specific PrecautionaryStatement phrase type has up to five PhraseCode instances, so the second last one would (in its most minimalistic form) be sent as

`

302 335 334 ...

`

This seems somewhat awkward and inconsistent to me, although certainly possible. Any suggestions if this should stay, or if the PrecautionaryStatementEnum should be extended to just the P phrase combinations cited in CLP?

dirk-qualisys commented 6 years ago

Re-searching, I just saw that this is reopening the discussion of last year's workshop documented in issue #77. As a personal note, I do not like the approach too much (thus the new issue), but unless others oppose, I will not reiterate the discussion.