Open volodymyrss opened 3 days ago
It's a cluster-wide issue that affects the bot...
DESI is affected by https://github.com/oda-hub/nb2workflow/issues/208
PhotoZ requires astrorama
conda channel, but we only use conda-forge
in Galaxy
PhotoZ requires
astrorama
conda channel, but we only useconda-forge
in Galaxy
On private instance, you can add astrorama
, right?
On private instance, you can add
astrorama
, right?
Yes, right. I can add it if really needed
On private instance, you can add
astrorama
, right?Yes, right. I can add it if really needed
Please do, to test. Then maybe we migrate to conda-forge.
DESI is affected by oda-hub/nb2workflow#208
But see comment there. It looks like DESI can't be easily added to Galaxy because it needs custom astroquery.
DESI is affected by oda-hub/nb2workflow#208
But see comment there. It looks like DESI can't be easily added to Galaxy because it needs custom astroquery.
@Andrei-EPFL , could you change to code of the notebook so that it does not depend on custom astroquery? Just take out the code from within custom astroquery module.
Please do, to test.
Well, I've just realised, the main issue with PhotoZ is PhosphorosTable input type. It's not yet supported and requires dedicated development
Please do, to test.
Well, I've just realised, the main issue with PhotoZ is PhosphorosTable input type. It's not yet supported and requires dedicated development
Can you treat it as json-encoded string field? This should be a fallback for all parameters derived from StructuredParameter . I imagine some development to treat it as string, but not nearly as extensive specialized as that in MMODA.
@dsavchenko I have adapted the environment.yml and added a "package" desi.py file in order to replace the github code. In addition, I have also added a galaxy_help.md file in the repository https://gitlab.renkulab.io/astronomy/mmoda/desi-legacy-survey . what would be the next step to make it go on galaxy?
what would be the next step to make it go on galaxy?
We need to merge https://github.com/oda-hub/nb2workflow/pull/209 first
@dsavchenko could you please check? At least DESI should be simple.