esi / esi-issues

Issue tracking and feature requests for ESI
https://esi.evetech.net/
209 stars 23 forks source link

EVE v19.11 - Mining Ledger Changes #1307

Open soratidus999 opened 2 years ago

soratidus999 commented 2 years ago

Feature Request

EVE Patch 19.11 introduced new mining changes (Residue) and added them to the in-game ledgers. This data has not been added to ESI endpoints https://esi.evetech.net/ui/#/Industry/get_corporation_corporation_id_mining_observers_observer_id https://esi.evetech.net/ui/#/Industry/get_characters_character_id_mining by the associated patch.

Use case

The same Corporation Management, Automated Taxation and moon monitoring that currently occurs. Without residue information our data could be missing up to 2697% of the mining volume.

Authentication

No changes required, this is simply to replicate features that were created on TQ without responsiblity or care to their assocated endpoints

Example return

Propose what an example return might look like. E.g.:

[
  {
    "character_id": 90406623,
    "last_updated": 2021-12-08
    "quantity": 420
    "residue": 69 <-- this field
    "recorded_corporation_id": 98434316
    "type_id": 45511
  },
  ... repeat ad absurdium
]

Checklist

Check all boxes that apply to this issue:

soratidus999 commented 2 years ago

I can be contacted for further testing on the CCP Partner Discord, or via this issue

soratidus999 commented 2 years ago

Upon in-game testing, Patch 19.11 did not bother to update the Corporation Mining Ledger with this feature either.

So in fairness to equating ESI to in-game features, this bug does not affect the Corporation endpoint, only Character.

richieknight commented 2 years ago

I for one would love to see ESI updated to reflect the new changes! Running corporate mining ops in Eve online is next to impossible at the moment!

jacben13 commented 2 years ago

Any update for this issue?

Not having this is impacting my corp's ability to accurate determine taxes from moon mining.

dreej-net commented 2 years ago

It might not be the right place to add this but worth to emphasize the need of it in my opinion :

StevenMortimer commented 2 years ago

Also wanting this feature. How do we get the priority raised so it can be addressed?