Open seb-wahl opened 3 years ago
I can reproduce that. I am working on it now
Hi @seb-wahl, could you please look at the hotfix here: https://github.com/esm-tools/esm_parser/pull/77 I hope it will solve your issue.
Did this work? If yes, please close the issue: we are trying to get less open things at the moment so we can make new issues of whatever needs to be solved and get the rest off the never-dying "list"
Version: latest version of all tools,
geomar
branch of esm_toolsWhen I add
to a
runscript
the extra flags are correctly added to the sbatch header of my runscript. However if add the same settings to mymachine.yaml
the are (as seen in the the*finished*.yaml
) either resolved incorrectly or ignored. I triedand
in my machine yaml. It does not matter whether I used strings or lists. I added a few print statements in
batch_system.py
which clearly show me that theadditional_flags
are already empty when they shall be processed inbatch_system.py
. So I assume something must go wrong when themachine.yaml
is parsed.What's going wrong here?