Open playfulFence opened 1 week ago
I'd say some of the "examples" which are deleted here should go to qa-test (ideally hil test but most of them cannot) instead of just deleting them.
While it's nice the doc tests compile, we should easily be able to verify those drivers still do what they are supposed to do
I guess since https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-hal/pull/2558 was merged, I can move part of deleted examples to qa-test
directory now.
Let's wait for the release to merge this
I guess in some places there are commented out println!
lines because before that didn't compile - we now have that in the before-snippet so no need to comment out these (but it's println!
not esp_println::println!
)
I think what @jessebraham meant is that some of those printlns were more of a noise for documentation than a benefit 🤔
I think I agree, probably most of those println made sense in the example but not in the documentation.
I think I agree, probably most of those println made sense in the example but not in the documentation.
I agree that most aren't needed, but some are.
Also in a lot of places we now have writeln!(serial_tx,".....
which is definitely more noise in examples than println!
Description
Moves things forward in terms of #2513. Some examples are still there, part of them will be removed when QA repo/directory is published.
Testing
xtask run-doc-tests esp-hal <chip>