Closed Vollbrecht closed 5 months ago
@AlixANNERAUD since you PR'ed the addition i want you just to notify that upstream esp-idf includes new API's if you are interested in the new fields
@AlixANNERAUD since you PR'ed the addition i want you just to notify that upstream esp-idf includes new API's if you are interested in the new fields
Okay, I'm in the exam period but I'll try to do it this week
@AlixANNERAUD since you PR'ed the addition i want you just to notify that upstream esp-idf includes new API's if you are interested in the new fields
Okay, I'm in the exam period but I'll try to do it this week
Yeah no worries there is no direct action needed, just a headsup for you :D Exams have priority, even if you want to rather work on some code ;)
@AlixANNERAUD since you PR'ed the addition i want you just to notify that upstream esp-idf includes new API's if you are interested in the new fields
I just checked, and the differences between esp-idf v5.2 and v5.3 (especially esp_vfs_fat.h
, sdmmc_host.h
and sdspi_host.h
), have little impact on the SD card / VFS aspects (just the refactoring of DMA for sdmmc_host_t
and refactoring of mount configuration for VFS), which doesn't seem to affect the user API, although the implementation for DMA seems a bit unclear. In addition, i don't think it's necessary to implement x_get_dma_info
either (but I can do it if you want to).
@AlixANNERAUD since you PR'ed the addition i want you just to notify that upstream esp-idf includes new API's if you are interested in the new fields
I just checked, and the differences between esp-idf v5.2 and v5.3 (especially
esp_vfs_fat.h
,sdmmc_host.h
andsdspi_host.h
), have little impact on the SD card / VFS aspects (just the refactoring of DMA forsdmmc_host_t
and refactoring of mount configuration for VFS), which doesn't seem to affect the user API, although the implementation for DMA seems a bit unclear. In addition, i don't think it's necessary to implementx_get_dma_info
either (but I can do it if you want to).
Thanks for the feedback. Its fine i think, if someone needs it he can extend the implementation as needed.
fix #433