Add compiler flag to have arithmetic expressions with float-types evaluate to float and not double

[icholy]

When using a float value in an arithmetic expression, the expression incorrectly evaluates to a double instead of float. This leads to a lot of unnecessary casts all over the place.

create schema Thing (value float);
create schema ThingPlusOne (value float);
insert into ThingPlusOne select value + 1 as value from Thing;

Exception in thread "main" com.espertech.esper.compiler.client.EPCompileException: Invalid assignment of column 'value' of type 'java.lang.Double' to event property 'value' typed as 'java.lang.Float', column and parameter types mismatch [insert into ThingPlusOne select value + 1 as value from Thing]

[bernhardttom]

short a=1; short b=2; short c=a*b; <-- doesn't compile ...provided is int

[bernhardttom]

Narrowing "int" to "short" wouldn't be allowed. I'd recommend plugin single row func.

[icholy]

The code I posted is contrived to demonstrate the issue. Writing single row functions for each of the arithmetic expressions in a query would be more verbose than the existing cast calls.

I understand that narrowing an int to a short isn't allowed. The issue is that short * short shouldn't be an int in the first place.

[bernhardttom]

Yeah well in the JVM world short * short = int There could however be a compiler flag to change the behavior.

[icholy]

@bernhardttom I wasn't aware that was the JVM behavior. I've updated the issue to only mention float which I believe is still incorrect.

float a = 123;
float b = 123;
System.out.println(((Object)(a + b)).getClass()); // java.lang.Float

[icholy]

Looks like these should be returning Float.class.

https://github.com/espertechinc/esper/blob/ab90bc7ffa8c58d419a9ea2f5f81634fc1fd8c2f/common/src/main/java/com/espertech/esper/common/internal/util/JavaClassHelper.java#L309-L314

[bernhardttom]

Due to backward compatibility the behavior stays as it is by default.

However a compiler flag to change the default behavior can be added.

Its possible the SQL standard prescribes it or is another reason this is the default behavior i.e. user request. I'll post when I find something.

[icholy]

Seems like it's implementation dependant.

75) Subclause 6.12, "": When the data type of either operand of an arithmetic operator is approximate numeric, the precision of the result is implementation-defined.

https://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt

I tested in postgres and it evaluates to a double

select 1::real + 1::integer -- "double precision"

[icholy]

Seems like this isn't a bug. Also, I can rewrite my original query using a float literal.

create schema Thing (value float);
create schema ThingPlusOne (value float);
insert into ThingPlusOne select value + 1f as value from Thing;

[icholy]

For the sake of completeness, here are the truth tables showing the JVM and Esper arithmetic coercion rules

JVM Arithmetic Coercion Rules

Target	Byte	Short	Integer	Long	Float	Double
Byte	Integer	Integer	Integer	Long	Float	Double
Short	Integer	Integer	Integer	Long	Float	Double
Integer	Integer	Integer	Integer	Long	Float	Double
Long	Long	Long	Long	Long	Float	Double
Float	Float	Float	Float	Float	Float	Double
Double	Double	Double	Double	Double	Double	Double

Esper Arithmetic Coercion Rules

Target	Byte	Short	Integer	Long	Float	Double
Byte	Integer	Integer	Integer	Long	Double	Double
Short	Integer	Integer	Integer	Long	Double	Double
Integer	Integer	Integer	Integer	Long	Double	Double
Long	Long	Long	Long	Long	Double	Double
Float	Double	Double	Double	Double	Float	Double
Double	Double	Double	Double	Double	Double	Double

[icholy]

I started implementing this and ran into this usage: https://github.com/espertechinc/esper/blob/8dd0c24c38c5ed4457229af2eb8383e332d46f37/common/src/main/java/com/espertech/esper/common/internal/epl/expression/ops/ExprInNodeImpl.java#L100

It's being called here:

https://github.com/espertechinc/esper/blob/8dd0c24c38c5ed4457229af2eb8383e332d46f37/common/src/main/java/com/espertech/esper/common/internal/epl/expression/ops/ExprInNodeImpl.java#L58-L63

I need the ExprValidationContext to access the Configuration. Is there a reason I shouldn't be using that validation context?

[raguessner]

Suggest to check for usages of validateWithoutContext (alt-F7 in Idea). Configuration probably needs to be passed in.