espressif / arduino-esp32

Arduino core for the ESP32
GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
13.75k stars 7.44k forks source link

Added support for Bharat Pi Node Wifi, Bharat Pi A7672S 4G Module and Bharat Pi LoRa boards #10401

Closed Bharat-Pi closed 1 month ago

Bharat-Pi commented 1 month ago

Checklist

All checklist is cleared

Description of Change

This Pull Request add support to three new hardware on the market using ESP32 modules, Bharat Pi Node Wifi , Bharat Pi A7672s 4G and Bharat Pi LoRa modules. Links to the hardware is provided below

Bharat Pi Node Wifi https://bharatpi.net/product/bharat-pi-node-wifi/

Bharat Pi A7672s 4G Board https://bharatpi.net/product/bharat-pi-4g-lte-module-with-esp32-simcom-a7672-with-gps/

Bharat Pi LoRa boards with Indian Frequency https://bharatpi.net/product/bharat-pi-lora-module-with-esp32-lora868mhz-transreceiver-with-esp32-arduino-compatible/

These boards are used by Students, Tinkerers across 100s of different colleges and universities and we are connected with the Espressif to launch these boards.

Tests scenarios

We have tested these changes on a Bharat Pi boards using the Arduino IDE and the ESP32 core with 4MB, 8MB and 16MB flash versions of ESP32. We have verified that the defined pins correspond to the correct hardware pins on the board. We tested the samples codes and libraries of our code and example codes. You can see our test codes in this page https://github.com/Bharat-Pi/iot-projects

Related links

This is a support package for new boards. https://github.com/Bharat-Pi/iot-projects https://bharatpi.net/product/bharat-pi-node-wifi/ https://bharatpi.net/product/bharat-pi-4g-lte-module-with-esp32-simcom-a7672-with-gps/ https://bharatpi.net/product/bharat-pi-lora-module-with-esp32-lora868mhz-transreceiver-with-esp32-arduino-compatible/

CLAassistant commented 1 month ago

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

:white_check_mark: Bharat-Pi
:x: Neo G


Neo G seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago
Warnings
:warning: **Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:** - the commit message `"Bharat Pi Arduino Libs for Lora and 4G Modules"`: - *summary* looks empty - *type/action* looks empty - the commit message `"Bharat Pi Arduino libs"`: - *summary* looks empty - *type/action* looks empty *** **Please fix these commit messages** - here are some basic tips: - follow [Conventional Commits style](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) - correct format of commit message should be: `(): `, for example `fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue` - allowed types are: `change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test` - sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 20 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter - avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers) `TIP:` Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the [Conventional Precommit Linter](https://github.com/espressif/conventional-precommit-linter)).
Messages
:book: You might consider squashing your 3 commits (simplifying branch history).

👋 Hello Bharat-Pi, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- Addressing info messages (📖) is strongly recommended; they're less critical but valuable.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by :no_entry_sign: dangerJS against 8c796ccf697f6865f21803fb38a855eb646c7984