Closed me-no-dev closed 1 week ago
Warnings | |
---|---|
:warning: | The Pull Request description looks very brief, please check if more details can be added. |
:warning: | The **target branch** for this Pull Request **must be the default branch** of the project (`master`). If you would like to add this feature to a different branch, please state this in the PR description and we will consider it. |
π Hello me-no-dev, we appreciate your contribution to this project!
This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.
DangerJS is triggered with each push
event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.
Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (β οΈ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.
We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.
1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
Generated by :no_entry_sign: dangerJS against 786d831d5aa3b86fba314fb027ae757ae95a1a11
β62 filesβββ62 suitesβββ7m 23s β±οΈ β22 testsββ21 β β0 π€β1 β 144 runsββ143 β β0 π€β1 β
For more details on these failures, see this check.
Results for commit 786d831d.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
@me-no-dev Great! Thx. Will test ASAP
Tested and build a framework without IPv6 support which worked to build an Arduino sketch with IPv4 only.
When IPv6 is disabled in IDF there is something broken. The example sketch https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/master/libraries/WebServer/examples/HelloServer/HelloServer.ino does compile connects to the AP but the WebServer is not reachable. Ping gets replys from the esp IP address.
@me-no-dev Webserver is now reachable with last commit. Build a small Tasmota Variant without IPv6 support. Looks like it is fully working.
cc: @Jason2866