github-actions[bot]
commented
4 days ago | Warnings | |
|---|---|
| :warning: | Please consider squashing your 7 commits (simplifying branch history). |
| :warning: | The **target branch** for this Pull Request **must be the default branch** of the project (`master`). If you would like to add this feature to a different branch, please state this in the PR description and we will consider it. |
👋 Hello SuGlider, we appreciate your contribution to this project!
Click to see more instructions ...
This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.
DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.
Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.
Review and merge process you can expect ...
We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.
1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
Generated by :no_entry_sign: dangerJS against 45375d1c4f2709c93e19dddf3f59fa95451afd62
Description of Change
A change to improve the code and the make it clearer to read and understand how Preference are being used in the code.
Tests scenarios
ESP32-S3 and CI using the example
Related links
https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/discussions/10542#discussioncomment-11286224