Supported targets

[erhankur]

I tried differential OTA on ESP32 but didn't work. ESP32-C3 is OK.

Can we clarify exactly which targets are supported for which features?

[WangYuxin-esp]

The current test shows that this scheme supports the ESP32-C series and ESP32-S3 chips. When this scheme is applied to ESP32, the volume of the corresponding bootloader.bin will increase a lot, resulting in the inability to use secure boot.

[erhankur]

Secure boot is an optional feature. I did not enable it but it still doesn't work on ESP32. Probably I miss something.

Also, I tried to build for ESP32-S3 but got iram overflow error. I am using idf master.

python $IDF_PATH/tools/idf_size.py build/bootloader/bootloader.map
Total sizes:
Used stat D/IRAM:   29968 bytes (  -1296 remain, 104.5% used) Overflow detected! You can run idf.py size-files for more information.
      .data size:      28 bytes
      .bss  size:     472 bytes
      .text size:   23312 bytes
    .rodata size:    6156 bytes
Total image size:   29496 bytes (.bin may be padded larger)

Do we need a custom linker like ESP32-Cx chips?

[WangYuxin-esp]

When using ESP32S3, please compile it on the v4.4 version of IDF. There is no official stable version of the master branch.

[erhankur]

Thanks @WangYuxin-esp .

Really good work. I think, this is hidden repo and deserves more attention. I believe most of the users will like it, especially those who have a connection via the gsm modem.

And my last question; What is the status of ESP32? Again should I test it with v4.4?

[WangYuxin-esp]

@erhankur Yes, for ESP32, you can use this scheme with v4.4 IDF.

[kohait00]

I could compile and start the bootloader w/ ESP32.. No further tests done though. The real neccessety is to simply extend the space for the bootloader