codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Base: 95.75% // Head: 95.87% // Increases project coverage by +0.11% :tada:
Coverage data is based on head (
1db934e) compared to base (78a773a). Patch coverage: 96.42% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #291 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 95.75% 95.87% +0.11% ========================================== Files 129 132 +3 Lines 5446 5523 +77 Branches 869 881 +12 ========================================== + Hits 5215 5295 +80 + Misses 155 154 -1 + Partials 76 74 -2 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `95.87% <96.42%> (+0.11%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/291?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [committees/admin/forms.py](https://codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/291?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#diff-Y29tbWl0dGVlcy9hZG1pbi9mb3Jtcy5weQ==) | `93.75% <93.75%> (ø)` | | | [committees/admin/models.py](https://codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/291?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#diff-Y29tbWl0dGVlcy9hZG1pbi9tb2RlbHMucHk=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [committees/admin/options.py](https://codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/291?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#diff-Y29tbWl0dGVlcy9hZG1pbi9vcHRpb25zLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [committees/committeecollective.py](https://codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/291?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#diff-Y29tbWl0dGVlcy9jb21taXR0ZWVjb2xsZWN0aXZlLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (+5.12%)` | :arrow_up: | | [utils/auth\_utils.py](https://codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/291?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#diff-dXRpbHMvYXV0aF91dGlscy5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [utils/viewcollectives.py](https://codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/291?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#diff-dXRpbHMvdmlld2NvbGxlY3RpdmVzLnB5) | `97.77% <0.00%> (+4.44%)` | :arrow_up: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
With two PRs nearly ready that extends on the AssociationGroup CollectiveView I figured it might be nice to have a better control than remembering and searching for the correct permissions for the correct tabs. So I automated that a bit: