Update Mailcow API 2024-08a

[EricTRL]

Mailcow's API was changed in one of the recent updates that we applied to our installation. This changes the way Squire handles the API:

• More robust: Squire will no longer crash when the MailCow API returns an unexpected item, or does not return an expected item. This won't prevent Squire from crashing from breaking API-changes, but will prevent issues like the one we've seen in this Mailcow update.
• API and Squire-dataclass mismatches are reported in squire/logs/squire.log. This log can be viewed from the server status tabs. Warnings are written to this file when:
  • Additional fields are returned by the MailCow API, but were not expected when Squire
  • Fields are expected by Squire('s dataclass), but not returned by the Mailcow API
  • A field value returned by the Mailcow API cannot be parsed in the expected format (e.g. Squire expects a boolean but '3' was returned)
• The logfile is highlighted when viewed in Squire

Screenshot


[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 62.59542% with 98 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.57%. Comparing base (02b3f6b) to head (5398d42).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
core/admin_status/views.py	28.00%	36 Missing :warning:
mailcow_integration/api/interface/base.py	68.23%	20 Missing and 7 partials :warning:
mailcow_integration/api/interface/mailbox.py	68.75%	10 Missing and 10 partials :warning:
mailcow_integration/api/interface/alias.py	56.66%	7 Missing and 6 partials :warning:
mailcow_integration/squire_mailcow.py	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #349 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 97.19% 96.57% -0.63% ========================================== Files 234 236 +2 Lines 14332 14564 +232 Branches 906 945 +39 ========================================== + Hits 13930 14065 +135 - Misses 261 334 +73 - Partials 141 165 +24 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/349/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/349/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights) | `96.57% <62.59%> (-0.63%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=esrg-knights#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.