Open essepuntato opened 6 years ago
Using your new compact CitationID, we should change the contents of the first column "citation_iri" to read: https://w3id.org/oc/virtual/citation/1-5 https://w3id.org/oc/virtual/citation/1-11 https://w3id.org/oc/virtual/citation/1-517 etc.
See also Issue 7 about incorrect DOIs.
This proposal is related to #21.
We would like to release, monthly, a CSV table summarising all the citation links included in the Corpus. In particular, we are thinking of using a five column table with the following header:
where:
citation IRI
is the IRI identifying that citation (see the proposal for citation IRIs at #23);citing ID
is the OCC internal identifier identifying the citing article (e.g.br/1
);citing URL
is a meaningful URL (if any) that allows one to identify the citing article outside the Corpus, e.g.https://doi.org/10.1097/igc.0000000000000609
(DOI URLs will have the precedence among others);cited ID
is the OCC internal identifier of the cited article (e.g.br/11
);cited URL
is a meaningful URL (if any) that allows one to identify the cited article outside the Corpus, e.g.https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200508000-00050
(DOI URLs will have the precedence among others).My personal opinion would be to have a four column table with the full information, in order to make the final user to do whatever he/she likes, e.g.:
In this way we basically are able to keep track of all the citations in a way that is easily processable by bibliometricians and without having additional expertise in Semantic Web technologies. A simple excerpt of such table is shown as follow: