Closed AndySchroder closed 4 months ago
We don’t have GitHub action ARM runner now.
you mean you don't have a device to test with?
If you need a Linux aarch64 binary file, you can compile it yourself. We will add it once GitHub provides a Linux ARM runner.
It compiles fine on aarch64 for me, I can do it that way, it would just be more convenient to have it pre-built.
However, if you can't do aarch64 right now, it would still be better if you named the file that you do have lpac-2.0.1-x86_64.deb
instead of lpac-2.0.1-Linux.deb
so that it's more clear that it only works on x86_64 and not aarch64. Also, no need to put "Linux" in the file name because .deb files only work on Linux anyway, it's redundant. Also, for the standalone version, lpac-linux-x86_64.zip
I'd recommend making this lpac-x86_64.tar.gz
. That is common convention, you don't need to add the word "Linux" in there.
Does https://github.com/uraimo/run-on-arch-action work for you to get an ARM runner?
it would still be better if you named the file that you do have
lpac-2.0.1-x86_64.deb
instead oflpac-2.0.1-Linux.deb
so that it's more clear that it only works on x86_64 and not aarch64. Also, no need to put "Linux" in the file name because .deb files only work on Linux anyway, it's redundant.
This comment is fixed in https://github.com/estkme-group/lpac/pull/109.
hello @AndySchroder could you tell me how you compiled it in ARM? using cross compilation? or on an actual ARM device?
On a raspi4.
For those that don't want to manually compile, please add a .zip and .deb file for aarch64-linux to https://github.com/estkme-group/lpac/releases so that we can run on 64bit arm processors.