Closed zhuying412 closed 10 months ago
Thanks, @Zhu-Ying . Was this change enough to fix the false negative you saw in #833 ? Did it improve your results overall, and not cause any other false positives or negatives elsewhere?
Thanks, @Zhu-Ying . Was this change enough to fix the false negative you saw in #833 ? Did it improve your results overall, and not cause any other false positives or negatives elsewhere?
Yes, if I set the window=2, I can get more CNVs which is smaller size,and the false negative CNV can be called. the window is larger, the sensitivity is lower. I don't know why, but it works. I think it will produce some false positives, but we need lower false negatives in clincal. we just want to make the -t (threshold/window) parameter actived,now the code is commented.
Great, thanks for your contribution!
make the window paramter activate of segment_hmm function
833