Closed davidbgk closed 7 years ago
Probably the same case as Blamécourt http://www.insee.fr/fr/methodes/nomenclatures/cog/fichecommunale.asp?codedep=95&codecom=065
Updated output:
cat data/towns.csv | grep Arthieul
COM95025@1968-01-01,95025,1968-01-01 00:00:00,1968-01-01 00:00:00,Arthieul,COM78355@1942-01-01,COM78025@1942-01-01,DEP95@1968-01-01,NULL,310
COM78025@1942-01-01,78025,1942-01-01 00:00:00,1967-12-31 23:59:59,Arthieul,COM95025@1968-01-01,,DEP78@1860-07-01;DEP78@1968-01-01,NULL,410
I think the second entry should not have DEP78@1968-01-01
as parent since its end datetime is before the departement start datetime.
Current:
See http://www.insee.fr/fr/methodes/nomenclatures/cog/fichecommunale.asp?codedep=95&codecom=025