Closed meowsbits closed 4 years ago
Totally agree that 1920000 is not a fork for us. It's a fork for ETH, not ETC. I really don't like EIP-2124 ("separating networks" can make it harder to establish peer list, IMHO), and EIP-2364 (why use both genesis hash and forkid (which "contains" information about genesis hash)?).
The good part is, that change is implemented as new version of a protocol, instead of changing the current one.
Closing, will manage idea at ECIPs context.
Need to spec and ensure that ETC clients and networks implementing this protocol know how to do this in a consistent way, eg is 1920000 a fork? I say no, but this should be up for discussion and review.