Closed Skycoder42 closed 1 year ago
In the current implementation, the value of ETEBASE_UTILS_PRETTY_FINGERPRINT_SIZE is wrong. If you look at https://github.com/etesync/libetebase/blob/master/src/lib.rs#L224, you can see that the size is defined as:
ETEBASE_UTILS_PRETTY_FINGERPRINT_SIZE
#[no_mangle] pub static ETEBASE_UTILS_PRETTY_FINGERPRINT_SIZE: usize = 1 + // Null 4 + // Newlines (3 * 12) + // Spacing (5 * 16); // Digits // sums up to be: 121
However, a few lines below, the fingerprint is document to have the following format:
45680 71497 88570 93128 19189 84243 25687 20837 47924 46071 54113 18789
Which means there are 2 instead of 4 newlines, only 9 spacing- and 12 digit-blocks. So, the size should actually be calculated as:
#[no_mangle] pub static ETEBASE_UTILS_PRETTY_FINGERPRINT_SIZE: usize = 1 + // Null 2 + // Newlines (3 * 9) + // Spacing (5 * 12); // Digits // sums up to be: 90
In the current implementation, the value of
ETEBASE_UTILS_PRETTY_FINGERPRINT_SIZE
is wrong. If you look at https://github.com/etesync/libetebase/blob/master/src/lib.rs#L224, you can see that the size is defined as:However, a few lines below, the fingerprint is document to have the following format:
Which means there are 2 instead of 4 newlines, only 9 spacing- and 12 digit-blocks. So, the size should actually be calculated as: