Closed ggrieco-tob closed 5 years ago
If the timeout is reached, the results are not meaningful, so I think it's fine to wait longer, until the user manually interrupts the process. Or is it rather #15 which is bothering you?
Or is it rather #15 which is bothering you?
Yes. Sorry I couldn't find that issue before! Feel free to close this issue if you want.
Great!
Even if you use the
timeout
command to control how much time securify should run, its subprocess (e.g.mustExplicit
) keep running for a long time. So, It will be very useful to allow the user to specify this timeout:https://github.com/eth-sri/securify/tree/b43c6573f70412ee252dd881c692141cfb9d3beb/src/main/java/ch/securify/analysis/Config.java#L23