Closed codyreading closed 1 year ago
Hi @codyreading, that's interesting. How do the depth maps look qualitatively? Does that also look incorrect?
Depth Maps look quite good qualitatively, I've uploaded some of the results here of nerfacto-visibility-cube:
If you could upload your depth maps, I'd love to compare them to visually see any differences.
Hi @codyreading, I requested access to your link. When you compute the metrics, do you clip the depth from 0 to 2? We do that in our evaluation here.
The depth maps you have look correct as far as I can tell. One more thing to double check is that you are using median
depth instead of expected
depth when rendering.
Okay let me check these out, thanks!
Hey @ethanweber! Apologies for the delay, but just checked that we clipped the depth from 0-2 and also used median
depth, I kept all the defaults.
I can rerun this to see if this type of behaviour is reoccuring.
Closing for now, I don't need to reproduce the depth metrics any longer
Hi, and thanks for the great work!
I have reproduced the experiments in Table 1, and for the most part the metrics are very similar to reported in the paper. The only inconsistency I found was the Depth metric.
Paper:
Reproduced:
I was wondering if this type of behavior is expected between different runs?