Closed fulldecent closed 11 months ago
Again, I am blocking this PR until 1/2 is split from 3.
@fulldecent would you mind looking at my rewrite? https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/6518
I believe this solves your use cases.
Thank you for sharing. As for https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/6518 I left a few notes here.
My concerns in this PR are not addressed by that alternate PR.
Specifically, https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/6483 addresses the main concern than "ERCs are too noisy". It solves that by making filtering an immediate feature of the website.
Specifically, ethereum/EIPs#6483 addresses the main concern than "ERCs are too noisy". It solves that by making filtering an immediate feature of the website.
Have you tried https://eips.pandapip1.com/search? It supports filtering:
https://eips.pandapip1.com/search?search=category%3ACore+status%3AReview+selfdestruct
On that I do not see a button here for filtering:
Compared to the other, the button is front and center on the homepage
(this screenshot is shown in light mode and rest assured that website also works in dark mode)
Fair enough. I'll add a filter button. Also, it's not buried:
(Also, what browser is that? It looks cool!)
That's Arc. I'll send you an invite code, just DM me @fulldecent or email me. Warning that there is an EXTREME amount of phone-homes which you can block with Little Snitch or similar.
That screenshot is showing search and browse links to show content. The other PR https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/6483 requires zero clicking and uses the well-known CTRL-F for search. So relatively, the other PR is burried.
That screenshot is showing search and browse links to show content. The other PR ethereum/EIPs#6483 requires zero clicking and uses the well-known CTRL-F for search. So relatively, the other PR is burried.
The other PR uses the K
key to open the search page, so the keybind is not relevant here. Additionally, it does need clicking to use the filters, while mine does not.
Issue closed!
Requesting a review please of https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/6483
This includes several changes furthering the goal of making EIPs useful, and keeping the community together rather than immediately splitting off several EIP groups with their own independent leadership and processes.
(Note that maybe EIPs will be split out, and maybe that is a good thing. Or not. But this is PR addresses immediate problems.)
I am requesting please a review of this PR as a whole as-is without modification as to whether it is a net improvement and whether it should be merged now.
Requesting this feedback on that PR as available---and then as necessary (if not merged) at the next EIPIP meeting.
If such consensus cannot be made to merge the PR as-is, I am alternatively requesting a review of the three specific initiatives above and a commitment to merge (with sufficient quorum/authority) if such a small refactoring of #6483 shall be made.