Closed poojaranjan closed 1 year ago
I have continually documented in the (currently closed) EIP-6269 why it is relevant to reconsider this, and numerous people have also shown support, e.g. on Twitter (I have linked some of them) & @xinbenlv also can see my arguments why it is important (see his comments https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/6269#issuecomment-1497701923). I kindly ask you to reconsider your decision as I really think it is wrong to close this important, definitional EIP.
Also, EIP editor @xinbenlv voiced his support here:
Yes, given the context of zkEVM, I think it's worthy to reopen this discussion about defining what's considered "EVM compliance"
Also we shall discuss it to be whether an informational or meta EIP?
It won't be possible for me to join the meeting due to a time issue but you find all of my arguments why this EIP draft should be re-opened in the GitHub trail after the PR got closed, e.g. here. TL;DR: An EIP should also serve the community to clear up ambiguities about core terminology, and this what I want to achieve here.
I believe we've come to a rough consensus on https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/5682 ("Security and Privacy"), and I just want to run it by everyone before opening a PR.
Fine by me
@pcaversaccio added for discussion
@timbeiko wants to talk about splitting ERCs and Core EIPs.
Again 😄 !
Closing in favor of #245
Date and Time
June 14, 2023 at 14:00 UTC
Location
Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel
YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw
Agenda
1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics
New Permissible Origins
Other
Changes to
Final
proposalsNone
2. Discussion continued or updates from past meetings
3. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.
4. EIP Editing Office Hour
5. Review action items from earlier meetings